Hi everyone 🙂 Today we're comparing Litespeed Cache with Swift Performance, two powerful caching plugins for WordPress. Both promise to improve your website's loading times and optimize performance. But which plugin is right for you? In this article, we'll take a closer look at both.
Litespeed Cache vs Swift Performance Pro
1. Installation & Setup
Litespeed cache
Litespeed cache is specifically designed for websites running on a LiteSpeed web server. Installation is done via the dashboard, just like any WordPress plugin. After activation, the plugin automatically detects the server and offers optimized settings. Basic setup is simple, but there are also many advanced options for advanced users. There are presets (pre-configured settings) that make setup super easy:
We use Extreme to get the best possible optimization.
Swift Performance
Swift Performance is more universal and can be used on various server types. Installation is straightforward, and the plugin offers a setup wizard that guides you through the basic settings. There is both a free version and a Pro version with advanced features. Here is the setup wizard:
There are also good presets here:
For our test we choose the “Maximum Optimization".
2. Functions and features
Caching mechanisms
- Litespeed cache: Uses server-side caching and provides features such as Edge Side Includes (ESI) to cache dynamic content.
- Swift Performance: Provides intelligent page cache, browser cache and supports various caching methods such as disk cache and memcached.
Image optimization
- Litespeed cache: Integrated image optimization with support for lazy loading and WebP conversion.
- Swift Performance: Also image optimization and lazy loading, with additional options for adjusting image sizes.
Database optimization
- Both plugins provide tools to clean up the database, remove revisions, spam comments and optimize tables.
CDN support
- Litespeed cache: Supports Content Delivery Network (CDN) integration and has native QUIC.cloud CDN support.
- Swift Performance: Supports various CDNs and offers easy integration via the settings.
3. User-friendliness
Litespeed cache
The dashboard is clearly laid out, but the multitude of options can be overwhelming for beginners. The documentation is comprehensive, and support responds quickly to inquiries.
Swift Performance
It offers an intuitive interface with a setup wizard suitable for beginners. Settings are logically organized, and there are helpful tooltips. The documentation is also helpful, and support is included in the Pro version.
4. Performance and speed
Tests show that both plugins can significantly reduce loading times. However, Litespeed cache LiteSpeed servers often deliver better results due to server-side optimizations. Swift Performance, on the other hand, offers consistent improvements across different server environments.
Performance comparison (same website)
Litespeed cache
Swift Performance Pro
Okay, Litespeed Cache is much stronger here.
5. Compatibility
Themes and Plugins
- Litespeed cache: Compatible with most themes and plugins, however, special features may be limited to LiteSpeed servers.
- Swift Performance: High compatibility and offers features to avoid conflicts with other plugins.
Server requirements
- Litespeed cache: Requires a LiteSpeed web server for full functionality.
- Swift Performance: Works on Apache, Nginx and other server types.
Swift Performance is compatible with virtually any server configuration. Therefore, this point goes to Swift.
6. Pricing
- Litespeed cache: Free to use, but some premium features require QUIC.cloud credits. The Litespeed web server costs money (license fees), while OpenLitespeed is free.
- Swift Performance: Offers a free version with limited features and a Pro version with an annual license fee.
7. Advantages and disadvantages
| plug-in | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| LiteSpeed Cache | – Optimized for LiteSpeed servers – Powerful caching mechanisms – Extensive functions | – Full functionality only on LiteSpeed servers – Complex for beginners |
| Swift Performance | – Universally applicable – User-friendly – Extensive optimization options | – Some features only in the Pro version – Limited support in free version |
Conclusion
Choosing between Litespeed Cache and Swift Performance depends on your specific needs and server environment. If you're using a LiteSpeed server and want to maximize performance, Litespeed Cache is the ideal choice. For users with different server types or those who value a user-friendly interface, Swift Performance might be a better fit.
I hope this review helps you! If you have any questions, feel free to leave a comment. 🙂
English 
Deutsch